• Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Facebook
  • Pinterest
  • email
Sensei MarketingSensei MarketingSensei MarketingSensei Marketing
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact

Challenging the Rules of Social Darwinism

By Sam Fiorella | Sensei Perspective | Comments are Closed | 9 April, 2012 | 0

“Survival of the Fittest”, first championed by philosopher Hebert Spencer is an extension of Charles Darwin’s theory on “natural selection”, which describes the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. Spenser’s sociological adaptation of Darwin’s biological theory has been sometimes referenced as “Social Darwinism” (note: the term “social” was not used to reference modern day “social media”).

In the business world, the term has been interpreted in many fashions but the main premise always remains: a product or brand whose attributes (naturally occurring by characteristic or manufactured by marketing) predisposes it to being beloved and supported by a the majority of consumers.
The economic applications of this principle have rarely included the social media factor; a new, disruptive player in the ecosystem. Can popularity, amplified by social media, alter the premise of Spencer’s fittest paradigm?
Case Study: Research in Motion (RIM).
Spoiler Alert: this is not another blog post about how RIM is circling the drain or speculating why or who should buy it. It’s about you and your part in dictating its history.
Recently, I engaged in a rather heated debate with colleagues about the merits of Apple vs. Google vs. RIM devices and operating systems. After what seemed like an eternity of technical diatribes, someone asked a simple yet pointed question and one that may be closer to the heart of the issue: how do consumers go from being diehard fanatics to diehard detractors over night?
Of course they were referencing the meteoric fall of RIM, which decended from “inventor of the Smart Phone”, enjoying the world’s largest marketshare to vulture food in what was really a nanosecond when you look back.  RIM’s Blackberry was supposed to be (and for a short while was) to the smart phone what Kleenex is to facial tissues.
Was the debatable innovation or technical missteps of RIM’s executives what caused it to go from the world’s mobile “fittest” to economic “weakling” overnight? Even passionate advocates of Social Darwinism will concede that any form of natural selection does not happen this quickly without some external factor such as an economics-version of a tsunami or meteor storm that kills off a species in one fell swoop. So what’s the external factor at play here?
Disrupting Social Darwinism
While we’re still charting the full impact of social media’s amplification factor vis-à-vis social influence, social status and networking, we can all agree that social bandwagonism is alive and in fact, rampant.
What is the impact of social media’s mob-mentality on the rules of Social Darwinism? In the case of RIM we might argue that it expedited – or possibly created – the speed at which it has lost public and investor favor.
Is RIM’s product so poor, so deficient that its death should be preordained? It has a proven history of innovation, an international network and large recurring revenue stream (albeit drastically lower than it once was) so why have consumers jumped off the bandwagon so quickly to avoid the “Blackberry plague” that threatens to kill their social cool-factor?
It is possible that RIM or its Blackberry device would have failed regardless of social media’s spotlight but would it have happened so quickly?  The new world-order for consumer brands seems to be ruled not by the survival of the fittest but social-popularity. Blackberry fanatics have thrust their “blue thumbs” into their pockets way too quickly for us to not concede that social media peer-pressure elevated social popularity to the top of the priority list over technical considerations and brand loyalty.
Mission Impossible: Overcoming “Social Media Darwinism”
In fact, I would argue the point a little further and state that it has created a hostile environment where even a very fit business can’t survive. RIM has not closed its doors yet pundits and analysts have all but written their epitaphs. The same way they wrote off MySpace, which despite the reports is enjoying a surge in popularity …and even revenue growth today.
I understand that this is their job…whatever sells the news but the general public isn’t selling anything? Or is it? Are we selling our own popularity…our own status? Are we all too happy – and too quick – to join the cool-kids that we’re inadvertently poisoning the environment for fit brands?
What are your thoughts? Has social influence created a social media tsunami? Have the rules of “survival of the fittest” been changed? Can a business overcome it?
Sam Fiorella – Sensei
Feed Yoru Community, Not Your Ego
See also: The Seven Deadly Sins of Market Leaders
#bizforum, Corporate Social Planning, Mobile, Social Influence, social media, The Social Economy

Sam Fiorella

Sam Fiorella is a Partner here at Sensei Marketing, a consulting and technology firm focused on aiding global companies grow their business value through improved customer experiences. Professionally, Sam has also co-authored: Influence Marketing: How To Create, Manage and Measure Brand Advocates and is a Professor of Marketing at Seneca College and an Adjunct Professor at Rutgers Center for Management Development. Sam is also the co-founder of YellowIsForHello, a not-for-profit corporation that seeks to decrease the rate of suicide among students through peer-to-peer connections.

More posts by Sam Fiorella

Related Post

  • The Uncomfortable Age of Transparency

    By Sam Fiorella | Comments are Closed

    Gone are the days of the stand-alone customer loyalty card (or just plain loyalty for that matter)  – we’re now seeing a range of new data, social media feeds and smart phones that are changingRead more

  • The Short-Sightedness of Customer Service

    By Sam Fiorella | Comments are Closed

    In my last post: Customer Service, Twitter and Why They Fail, I stated that the use ofTwitter for customer service communications may not be delivering businesses what it can or should. I argued that currentRead more

  • Does your Brand have Social Momentum?

    By Sam Fiorella | Comments are Closed

    Social Momentum is the public perception that a brand is up-and-coming, exciting, and a must-be-followed.  By contrast, a legacy brand is seen as having achieved its full potential; nothing new or exciting is expected fromRead more

  • The Inevitability of Social Business?

    By Sam Fiorella | Comments are Closed

    Once again Chris Heuer has inspired another blog post here on the Social Roadmap. This past week Chris & I were back to back speakers at the Social Media Masters conference in Los Angeles, whereRead more

  • Does Social Influence Scoring Drive Value to Brands | #bizforum video debate

    By Sam Fiorella | Comments are Closed

    There’s been so much talk about the accuracy, value or benefit of social influence scoring tools this past year; most of it about you. What does it do for you? How does it impact you?Read more

Home
BONDAI Platform
BONDAI Services
BONDAI Partner Program
Gift My Client Corporate Gifting
About
Contact
100 University Avenue
Suite 500
Toronto ON
Canada
M5J 1V6
Phone: 1.416.484.1400
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
Sensei Marketing